The Role of the Constitutional Court in Legal Reform in Indonesia Through Judicial Review and Constitutional Legal Discovery

Authors

  • Bambang Sujatmiko Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Azis Budianto Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.535

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Judicial Review, Constitutional Legal Discovery

Abstract

This essay examines how the Constitutional Court (MK) uses judicial review and constitutional law discovery (constitutional rechtsvinding) to strategically advance legal reform in Indonesia. The MK has the power to test laws against the constitution and interpret its fundamental principles as an organization that protects it, as stipulated in Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and operationalized by Law Number 24 of 2003 as amended by Law Number 7 of 2020. The phenomenon of increasing requests for judicial review indicates a gap between written law and the need for substantive justice in society. In this context, constitutional judges are required not to simply be mouthpieces of the law, but to investigate and comprehend the concept of social justice as required by Law Number 48 of 2009 about Judicial Power, Article 5 paragraph (1). This study demonstrates that the MK actively participates as a force for legal reform that may bridge the gap between social fairness and legal certainty by using the progressive legal theory approach developed by Satjipto Rahardjo. Decisions from the Constitutional Court, including those made during the judicial review of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Job Creation Law, demonstrate the institution's transformational role in maintaining the relevance of law to current developments. Thus, the integration of judicial review and constitutional legal discovery makes the Constitutional Court a key instrument in shaping a legal system that is adaptive, responsive, and substantively just.

References

Adhani, H. (2021). Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia di Era Digital: Upaya Menegakan Konstitusi, Keadilan Substantif dan Budaya Sadar Berkonstitusi. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(2), 130-146.

Deta, M. U., Suandika, I. N., & Pidada, I. B. (2024). Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengadili Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi (Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi). Student Research Journal, 2(4), 47-77.

Harini, M., & Rahmat, D. (2025). Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim. Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 207-230.

Kurniawan, I. G. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Utilitarianisme. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 282-298.

Putri, W. A., & Kharisma, D. B. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Republik Indonesia. Sovereignty, 1(4), 671-680.

Ramadan, W. A., Nusantara, I. A., & Mitasari, T. (2022). Reformulasi pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi demi meningkatkan efektivitas penegakan kode etik hakim konstitusi. Jurnal Studia Legalia, 3(2), 21-43.

Rishan, I. (2021). Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 1-21.

Sadzali, A. (2022). Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi Substantif pada Pemilu 2024 melalui Penegakan Hukum Progresif. As-siyasi: Journal of constitutional law, 2(2), 193-218.

Safitri, M., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Peranan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Negara Indonesia (Mengenal Mahkamah Konstitusi). Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 71-76.

Sari, A. F., & Raharjo, P. S. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai negative legislator dan positive legislator. Sovereignty, 1(4), 681-691.

Siahaan, M. (2022). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suparno, & Jalil, A. (2022). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim di Indonesia. Law, Development and Justice Review, 5(1), 47-59.

Supena, C. C. (2022). Manfaat Penafsiran Hukum Dalam Rangka Penemuan Hukum. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 8(2), 427-435.

Tambunan, E. M., Sembiring, R. E., Gozali, F., & Sianturi, D. M. (2024). Analisis Eksistensi Etika Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan Berintegritas Dan Akuntabel (Putusan Mk No. 90/Puu-Xxi/2023). Iblam Law Review, 4(2), 50-61.

Wijaya, R. (2023). Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(1), 23-27.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Sujatmiko, B., & Budianto, A. (2025). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Legal Reform in Indonesia Through Judicial Review and Constitutional Legal Discovery. Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik, 3(4), 1112–1120. https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i4.535

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (November 2025 - Januari 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Sujatmiko, Azis Budianto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta :

Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
  2. Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (JGSP) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
  3. Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali di JGSP.

Most read articles by the same author(s)