The Role of The Property Sector in Fiscal Policy Transmission: A Case Study of The Economic Stimulus Program

Authors

  • Ary Andrian Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
  • Yolanda Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jgia.v3i4.574

Keywords:

fiscal policy, property sector, economic stimulus, policy transmission, multiplier effect

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of the property sector as a channel for fiscal policy transmission through economic stimulus programs in Indonesia. The property sector has a significant multiplier effect on the national economy, contributing 15.3 percent to Gross Domestic Product in 2023. The research method uses a quantitative approach with secondary data analysis for the 2019-2024 period. The results show that tax incentives and easier home ownership loans can increase property transactions by 23.7 percent and absorb an additional 1.2 million workers. Fiscal policy transmission through the property sector has proven effective in stimulating real economic activity in related industries. These findings contribute to the public economics literature on the effectiveness of fiscal policy transmission channels in developing countries.

References

Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1-27.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Konstruksi Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Bank Indonesia. (2024). Statistik Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368.

Davis, M. A., & Heathcote, J. (2005). Housing and the business cycle. International Economic Review, 46(3), 751-784.

Hakim, A. R., & Anwar, C. J. (2021). Keterkaitan kredit perbankan dan harga properti di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(2), 145-168.

Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Vegh, C. A. (2013). How big are fiscal multipliers? Implications for fiscal stabilization. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 231-270.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Laporan Kinerja Program Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional 2021. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan.

Leung, C. (2004). Macroeconomics and housing: A review of the literature. Journal of Housing Economics, 13(4), 249-267.

Mian, A., & Sufi, A. (2012). The effects of fiscal stimulus: Evidence from the 2009 Cash for Clunkers program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1107-1142.

Poterba, J. M. (1992). Taxation and housing: Old questions, new answers. American Economic Review, 82(2), 237-242.

Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 673-685.

Real Estate Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Pasar Properti Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: Real Estate Indonesia.

Utami, S., & Prasetyo, D. (2022). Dampak insentif fiskal terhadap transaksi properti residensial di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Development, 22(1), 34-58.

Winarno, B., & Darmawan, I. (2019). Determinan harga properti residensial di Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 8(2), 187-210.

Published

2025-12-06

How to Cite

Andrian, A., & Yolanda. (2025). The Role of The Property Sector in Fiscal Policy Transmission: A Case Study of The Economic Stimulus Program. Jurnal Greenation Ilmu Akuntansi, 3(4), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.38035/jgia.v3i4.574