Green-Claim Skepticism as a Boundary Condition of Received Green Word-of-Mouth among Generation Z Consumers

Authors

  • Hilman Hidayat Universitas Teknologi Bandung, Kota Bandung, Indonesia
  • Meilani Eka Putri Andrean Universitas Teknologi Bandung, Kota Bandung, Indonesia
  • Sri Kuswayati Universitas Teknologi Bandung, Kota Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ferry Koesindratmono Universitas Teknologi Bandung, Kota Bandung, Indonesia
  • Neneng Susanti Universitas Widyatama, Kota Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/gmbr.v2i2.733

Keywords:

Received green word-of-mouth, Green-claim Skepticism, Environmental Concern, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness, Green Purchase Intention, Generation Z

Abstract

Green peer communication is frequently treated as a persuasive route to sustainable consumption, yet its association with purchase intention may depend on consumers' internal evaluations and confidence in environmental claims. This study examines how received green word-of-mouth is associated with green purchase intention among Generation Z consumers in Bandung, Indonesia. Using the stimulus-organism-response framework and self-efficacy reasoning, environmental concern and perceived consumer effectiveness are modelled as parallel mediators, while green-claim skepticism is specified as a direct inhibitor and a first-stage moderator. A cross-sectional purposive survey produced 278 valid responses, which were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Received green word-of-mouth was positively associated with both mediators, and both were positively associated with purchase intention, whereas its direct path to intention was non-significant. Green-claim skepticism was negatively associated with purchase intention and weakened the first-stage relationships. The conditional indirect effects remained positive but declined as skepticism increased. The findings indicate that peer communication is most relevant when it corresponds with concern and personal efficacy and when environmental claims remain credible and verifiable.

References

Albayrak, T., Aksoy, S., & Caber, M. (2013). The effect of environmental concern and scepticism on green purchase behaviour. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501311292902

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Estimating moderating effects in PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM: Interaction term generation and data treatment. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.2(2)01

Bigne, E., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited. Journal of Business Research, 115, 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.031

BPS-Statistics Indonesia Bandung Municipality. (2025). Population by school age in Bandung City, 2024. https://bandungkota.bps.go.id/en/statistics-table/2/MjI1MSMy/population-by-school-age-in-bandung-city.html

Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502-520. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216250

Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008

Do Paco, A. M. F., & Reis, R. (2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672463

Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569101000206

Fabiola, K., & Mayangsari, L. (2020). The influence of green skepticism, environmental knowledge and environmental concern on Generation Z's green purchase intentions in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(8), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i8.470

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S. (2016). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 629-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.122

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: A meta-analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(5), 1203-1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y

Jacoby, J. (2002). Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_05

Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., & Chan, H. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131

Leonidou, C. N., & Skarmeas, D. (2017). Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2829-4

Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834804

Mohr, L. A., Eroglu, D., & Ellen, P. S. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers' communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1998.tb00399.x

Nguyen, T. T. H., Yang, Z., Nguyen, N., Johnson, L. W., & Cao, T. K. (2019). Greenwash and green purchase intention: The mediating role of green skepticism. Sustainability, 11(9), 2653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092653

Pagiaslis, A., & Krontalis, A. K. (2014). Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge, and beliefs. Psychology & Marketing, 31(5), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20698

Parveen, A., & Chaudhary, R. (2025). Do attitude and subjective norm mediate the relationship between social media e-WOM and green purchase intention? An empirical investigation using PLS-SEM. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 50(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/02560909241297015

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316

Riva, F., Magrizos, S., Rizomyliotis, I., & Uddin, M. R. (2024). Beyond the hype: Deciphering brand trust amid sustainability skepticism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6491-6506. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3829

Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00150-6

Rosyihuddin, M., & Krisnawati, W. (2025). Green word of mouth, green knowledge, green value, dan purchase intention produk tumbler pada Generasi Z. Jurnal Riset Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.30587/jre.v8i1.10400

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831-1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004

Sultan, P., Wong, H. Y., & Azam, M. S. (2021). How perceived communication source and food value stimulate purchase intention of organic food: An examination of the stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127807

Vieira, V. A. (2013). Stimuli-organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.009

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120

Published

2026-09-27

How to Cite

Hidayat, H., Andrean, M. E. P., Kuswayati, S., Koesindratmono, F., & Susanti, N. (2026). Green-Claim Skepticism as a Boundary Condition of Received Green Word-of-Mouth among Generation Z Consumers. Greenation Management and Business Review, 2(2), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.38035/gmbr.v2i2.733