Analisis Adopsi Inovasi Pertanian Cerdas Iklim berbasis Teknologi Pertanian Presisi di Kabupaten Sleman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jgpp.v4i2.642Keywords:
innovation adoption, climate change impact, climate-smart agriculture, precision agricultureAbstract
The decline in chili productivity due to extreme weather anomalies in Merdikorejo Village underlies the importance of strengthening farmer capacity after the Climate Change Impact Technical Guidance through the integration of precision agriculture technology to ensure the economic sustainability of the horticultural sector. This study aims to examine the adoption process of precision agriculture technology innovations among farmers in Merdikorejo Village, Tempel Sub-district, Sleman Regency. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, this research is in the form of a case study. Data collection involved interviews with 6 (six) informants representing a combination of farmer groups, observations, and Focus Group Discussions (FGD), with triangulation techniques. The results of the study indicate that the adoption of precision agriculture technology in Merdikorejo is not simply a transfer of technical equipment, but rather a complex mental and managerial transformation through five stages of innovation diffusion. At the knowledge and persuasion stage, exposure to formal information (DPI Technical Guidance) and informal information (experiential learning) successfully triggered farmer self-efficacy to carry out off-season cultivation with a projected profit margin of 61.72%. The decision-making and implementation phases in the field triggered an agreement to accelerate the planting of the RM 21 chili variety by a core group that integrates modern technology with local wisdom (Pranata Mangsa). Furthermore, in the confirmation phase, the successful technical testing of the closed-loop system on sloping land alleviated farmers' technological anxiety. Judging by their behavioral patterns, the adoption process moved through two main pathways: a structured institutional pathway that shapes the characteristics of the early majority and a self-help pathway based on field experience that shapes the characteristics of farmer innovators. These two groups converged in a horizontal social interaction space (peer-to-peer learning) with intensive mentoring from extension workers as change agents. This synergy not only encouraged reinvention (technical modification) of components but also increased farmers' managerial capacity toward climate-smart (less-labor) agriculture. At the macro scale, the sustainability of this innovation was firmly integrated with the strengthening of auction market institutions (gathering points) that ensured commodity price stability and farmer economic sustainability.
References
Abdur Rahman, L., Sugihardjo, Suminah, & Wahyu Hanifah, V. (2024). Efektivitas BIMTEK di Masa Pandemi Bagi Petani Milenial di Kabupaten Soppeng dan Kabupaten Wajo Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Journal of Integrated Agricultural Socio Economics and Entrepreneurial Research .
Alotibi, Y. S. (2025). A socio-technical agent-based simulation model for predicting smart agriculture adoption dynamics. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27523-7
Arifah, Salman, D., Yassi, A., & Bahsar-Demmallino, E. (2022). Climate change impacts and the rice farmers’ responses at irrigated upstream and downstream in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11923
Arimbawa, P., Limi, M. A., Sarinah, & Bahari, D. I. (2025). The role of progressive farmers in East Kolaka as opinion leaders: Effective communication strategies for organic rice innovation diffusion. AGROMIX, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v16i1.5923
Bhatnagar, S., Chaudhary, R., Sharma, S., Janjhua, Y., Thakur, P., Sharma, P., & Keprate, A. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of climate-smart agricultural practices for sustainable resilience in a changing climate. In Environmental and Sustainability Indicators (Vol. 24). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100535
Ejem, A. A., Aremu, C., Ajakaiye, O. O. P., Ben-Enukora, C., Akerele-Popoola, O. E., Ibiwoye, T. I., & Olaniran, A. F. (2023). Perspectives on communicating 21st-Century agricultural innovations to Nigerian rural farmers. In Journal of Agriculture and Food Research (Vol. 11). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100511
Eyitayo Raji, Tochukwu Ignatius Ijomah, & Osemeike Gloria Eyieyien. (2024). Integrating technology, market strategies, and strategic management in agricultural economics for enhanced productivity. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(7), 2112–2124. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i7.1260
Geng, W., Liu, L., Zhao, J., Kang, X., & Wang, W. (2024). Digital Technologies Adoption and Economic Benefits in Agriculture: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114431
Grigorieva, E., Livenets, A., & Stelmakh, E. (2023). Adaptation of Agriculture to Climate Change: A Scoping Review. In Climate (Vol. 11, Number 10). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11100202
Hirakawa, S., Masuyama, H., Sudiarta, I. P., Suprapta, D. N., & Shiotsu, F. (2024). Initiatives and Prospects for Sustainable Agricultural Production in Karangasem Regency, Bali, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020517
Kabato, W., Getnet, G. T., Sinore, T., Nemeth, A., & Molnár, Z. (2025). Towards Climate-Smart Agriculture: Strategies for Sustainable Agricultural Production, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Reduction. In Agronomy (Vol. 15, Number 3). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030565
Kangogo, D., Dentoni, D., & Bijman, J. (2021). Adoption of climate‐smart agriculture among smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter? Land Use Policy, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105666
Kendall, H., Clark, B., Li, W., Jin, S., Jones, G. D., Chen, J., Taylor, J., Li, Z., & Frewer, L. J. (2022). Precision agriculture technology adoption: a qualitative study of small-scale commercial “family farms” located in the North China Plain. Precision Agriculture, 23(1), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09839-2
Lee, C.-L., Strong, R., & Dooley, K. (2021). Analyzing Precision Agriculture Adoption Across the Globe: A Systematic Review of Scholarship from 1999 – 2020. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202106.0625.v1
Li, J., Liu, G., Chen, Y., & Li, R. (2023). Study on the influence mechanism of adoption of smart agriculture technology behavior. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35091-x
Liu, D., Samtani, J. B., Johnson, C. S., Butler, D. M., & Derr, J. (2020). Weed Control Assessment of Various Carbon Sources for Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(sup1), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1774472
Ma, W., & Rahut, D. B. (2024). Climate-smart agriculture: adoption, impacts, and implications for sustainable development. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10139-z
Magesa, B. A., Mohan, G., Matsuda, H., Melts, I., Kefi, M., & Fukushi, K. (2023). Understanding the farmers’ choices and adoption of adaptation strategies, and plans to climate change impact in Africa: A systematic review. In Climate Services (Vol. 30). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100362
Manning, L. (2024). Innovating in an Uncertain World: Understanding the Social, Technical and Systemic Barriers to Farmers Adopting New Technologies. Challenges, 15(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe15020032
Matous, P. (2023). Male and stale? Questioning the role of “opinion leaders” in agricultural programs. Agriculture and Human Values, 40(3), 1205–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10415-9
Mesfin, H., Tessema, Y. M., Tirivayi, N., & Nillesen, E. (2023). Effective Knowledge Transmission and Learning in Agriculture: Evidence from a Randomised Training Experiment in Ethiopia. Africa Development, 48(1), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v48i1.3039
Mgendi, G., Mao, S., & Qiao, F. (2021). Does agricultural training and demonstration matter in technology adoption? The empirical evidence from small rice farmers in Tanzania. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3997868
Mishra, N., Bhandari, N., Maraseni, T., Devkota, N., Khanal, G., Bhusal, B., Basyal, D. K., Paudel, U. R., & Danuwar, R. K. (2024). Technology in farming: Unleashing farmers’ behavioral intention for the adoption of agriculture 5.0. PLoS ONE, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308883
Nurlaela, S., Lestari, T., Rizqi Damayanti, E., & Panicara, S. (2024). Adoption Innovation Strategy in Organic Farming Innovation. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pertanian, 8(3), 793. http://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/agrisocionomics
Okumah, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Chapman, P. J., Novo, P., Cassidy, R., Lyon, C., Higgins, A., & Doody, D. (2021). The role of experiential learning in the adoption of best land management practices. Land Use Policy, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105397
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science.
Rizzo, G., Migliore, G., Schifani, G., & Vecchio, R. (2024). Key factors influencing farmers’ adoption of sustainable innovations: a systematic literature review and research agenda. In Organic Agriculture (Vol. 14, Number 1, pp. 57–84). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00440-7
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations.
Rosário, J., Madureira, L., Marques, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Understanding Farmers’ Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review. In Agronomy (Vol. 12, Number 11). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112879
Sargani, G. R., Shen, Y., Liu, Y., Joyo, M. A., Liu, J., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023). Farm risks, livelihood asset allocation, and adaptation practices in response to climate change: A cross-country analysis. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1066937
Shahbaz, P., ul Haq, S., Abbas, A., Batool, Z., Alotaibi, B. A., & Nayak, R. K. (2022). Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices through Women Involvement in Decision Making Process: Exploring the Role of Empowerment and Innovativeness. Agriculture (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081161
Silici, L., Rowe, A., Suppiramaniam, N., & Knox, J. W. (2021). Building adaptive capacity of smallholder agriculture to climate change: evidence synthesis on learning outcomes. In Environmental Research Communications (Vol. 3, Number 12). Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/AC44DF
Sugiyono. (2023). Using Android-Based Learning Media Using Smart Apps Creator (SAC) to Increase Motivation Students Learn Biology. Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education.
Sun, X., Ritzema, H., Huang, X., Bai, X., & Hellegers, P. (2022). Assessment of farmers’ water and fertilizer practices and perceptions in the North China Plain. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(4), 980–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2719
Uli Sihombing, V., Siadari, U., Sari, R., & Ardansah Munthe, M. (2023). THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND FOOD SECURITY IN INDONESIA. Journal of Agri Socio Economic and Business, 05(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.31186/jaseb.05.2.191-202
Vecchio, Y., Agnusdei, G. P., Miglietta, P. P., & Capitanio, F. (2020). Adoption of precision farming tools: The case of italian farmers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030869
Zou, Z., Li, C., Wu, X., Meng, Z., & Cheng, C. (2024). The effect of day-to-day temperature variability on agricultural productivity. Environmental Research Letters , 19(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8ede
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nanda Ardelya, Mastur, Siti Nurlaela

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta :
Penulis yang mempublikasikan manuskripnya di jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal Greenation Pertanian dan Perkebunan (JGPP) berhak menjadi yang pertama menerbitkan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0) .
- Penulis dapat mengirimkan artikel secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-eksklusif manuskrip yang telah diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini ke versi lain (misalnya, dikirim ke repositori institusi penulis, publikasi ke dalam buku, dll.), dengan mengakui bahwa manuskrip telah diterbitkan pertama kali diJGPP.




















